Mar 31

Are you one of the growing number of people struggling to make mid-career changes? Searching for ten easy steps to professional reinvention? Or awaiting flashes of insight—while opportunities pass you by?

Would you be willing to jettison all you’ve heard about career transition and follow a crooked path—rather than the straight and narrow one that’s gotten you nowhere?

If so, consider the counterintuitive approach described in this article. It’ll have you doing instead of infinitely planning. Taking action instead of endless self-assessment tests. You’ll reinvent your working identity—your sense of who you are as a professional—by experimenting with who you could be.

The Idea at Work

Sounds reasonable, but …
Consider the traditional “plan and implement” approach to career change: Assess your interests, skills, and experience; identify appropriate jobs; consult friends, colleagues, career counselors; take the plunge.

This all sounds reasonable—but it actually fosters stagnation. You get mired in introspection while searching for your “one true self”—a futile quest, since individuals have many possible selves. Your ideal won’t necessarily find a match in the real world. Worse, this method encourages making a big change all at once—which can land you in the wrong job.

Sounds crazy, but
Now consider the “test and learn” method: You put several working identities into practice, refining them until they’re sufficiently grounded in experience to inspire more decisive steps. You make your possible future working identities vivid, tangible, and compelling—countering the tendency to grab familiar work when the unknown becomes too scary. Reinventing your working identity takes several years—and may land you in surprising places. But that doesn’t mean the process must be random. These tactics provide a method to the seeming madness:

•    Craft experiments. Play with new professional roles on a limited but tangible scale, without compromising your current job. Try freelance assignments or pro bono work. Moonlight. Use sabbaticals or extended vacations to explore new directions.

EXAMPLE:
A former investment banker dabbled in wine tours and scuba diving businesses before determining that such work wouldn’t hold his interest long-term. Realizing a “more normal” career path would better serve his emotional and financial needs, he is now a internal venture capitalist for a media company.

•    Shift connections. Strangers can best help you see who you’re becoming, providing fresh ideas uncolored by your previous identity. Make new connections by working for people you’ve long admired and can learn from. Find people—perhaps through alumni and company networks—who can help you grow into your possible new selves.

•    Make sense. Infuse events with special meaning. Weave them into a story about who you’re becoming. Relate that story publicly. You’ll clarify your intentions, stay motivated, and inspire others’ support.

EXAMPLE:
An investment banker considering fiction writing visited an astrologer, who noted that forces pulling him in opposing directions (stability versus creative expression) were irreconcilable.He told everyone this story and wrote about it in his local newspaper. The more he communicated it, the more the incident made sense—and the more friends and family supported his writing ambitions.


Purchase the full-length Harvard Business Review article.

Mar 31

Part of your career management needs to be dealing with conflict at work. So resolving conflicts in the workplace is the topic of today’s article on Your Career Service.

Because you work in an environment that’s often lean and mean, things often get – mean. And conflicts in the workplace can be a fact of life. That’s why many companies emphasize conflict resolution — buzzwords meaning ways to help you and your fellow workers get along better by resolving frictions.

Resolving conflicts at work

When tempers flair, there are many methods you can use to handle conflict resolution. One of them, a simple technique to apply at work or home, is called the ECA Formula – Express yourself honestly, Communicate, and Compromise.

Express yourself honestly

Sometimes you get anxious about expressing difficult feelings openly because you’re afraid others won’t like what you say. But suppressing feelings can make you tense and filled with resentment. So you need to take the next step.

Communicate

Communicating means active listening. Although this might feel counterintuitive, communicating is listening. So you need to communicate by first listening to your colleague’s words. And then repeat them back in your own words to make sure you understand the message. When expressing your position, avoid accusing your co-worker. Instead of using the word you – as in “you hurt me” – say, “I felt hurt.” Then….

Compromise

When it comes to avoiding conflict at work, your goal needs to be getting along with others, not winning arguments. The next time you observe conflict on the job, ask yourself this question: “How can this discord be resolved so both of us feel good?”

To handle conflicts in the workplace it isn’t always easy. With practice, however, you’ll learn how to improve relationships at home and at work.

Mar 31

Building a hospital wing for pediatric AIDS patients. Supporting research to preserve the polar bear’s habitat. Establishing an endowment at the student newspaper that gave you your start. For the philanthropic, giving back can be a beautiful thing.

Reducing your taxes is a beautiful thing too.

For high-income taxpayers seeking to shelter income, philanthropy can be the gift that keeps on giving. Instead of writing checks, though, savvy investors are signing over appreciated securities.

In the process, they’re reaping double tax breaks—one for the current value of the securities, and again by avoiding capital-gains tax on the appreciation.

In some cases, donors are also getting paid for their generosity, through a charitable gift annuity or charitable trust. These two staples of the "planned-giving" repertoire give benefactors a fixed income over their lifetime as well as the immediate benefits of both capital gains and charitable tax deductions.

(A caveat: The securities must be held by the donor for a minimum of one year to qualify. At the individual’s death, the charity or institution applies the gift according to the donor’s instructions.)

Other philanthropic strategies—foundations, trusts, and hugely popular donor-advised funds—offer the same tax benefits, but don’t generate income for the donor.

At the U.J.A. Federation of New York, 60 to 70 percent of the total dollars it receives as planned giving comes to the organization as appreciated securities from major donors, William Samers, vice president for planned giving and endowments, says.

"You’ll see more planned gifts in a market like this," he says. "Whether it’s the high-net-worth individual concerned about another Bear Stearns, I don’t know. After the internet bubble, people rushed to lock in gains. It’s the same now."

Surprisingly, many investors who engage in charitable giving—as much as 45 percent, according to some research—don’t realize that multiple tax breaks are available to them, Kimberley Wright-Violich, president of Schwab Charitable in San Francisco, says.

An October 2007 study by Fidelity Investments found an even greater percentage—more than two-thirds of the individuals surveyed—weren’t aware of the additional tax advantages of donating appreciated securities.

Another big slice—39 percent—didn’t realize that they could hold onto fast-growing stocks and reap a tax benefit by repurchasing shares after donating them. That locks in a higher cost basis and avoids capital-gains tax on the appreciation.

Another 17 percent of respondents to the Fidelity survey didn’t understand the tax benefits of donating appreciated securities at all, while 10 percent didn’t know you could use appreciated securities to fund philanthropy.

Nor do most potential donors consider the nuances involved with small, local charities that can affect their giving, Wright-Violich adds. Many of these groups don’t have their own brokerage accounts, for example.

Donor-advised funds offered by Schwab, Vanguard, and Fidelity, among others, solve many of these problems, Wright-Violich says. They offer flexibility, ease of entry and execution, and the knowledge that "you’re not committing to something for a lifetime."
 
At Schwab Charitable, which manages more than $2 billion in contributions, generous investors can choose a donor-advised fund as an alternative to private foundations, using as little as $5,000 in appreciated securities, Wright-Violich says.

In this way, she adds, a donor with annual income of $100,000 avoids capital-gains tax and receives a charitable deduction, reducing his or her taxable income to $95,000.

Schwab liquidates the donated securities and the proceeds belong to the donor-advised fund. The fund, in turn, invests them in one or more of a family of seven mutual funds, Wright-Violich explains.

The donor has the right to advise how the contribution is invested and how the proceeds are granted or donated at his or her death. The donor may also designate a family member or other individual to take over the donor advisory function.

Meanwhile, that $5,000 in the donor-advised fund continues to grow until the donor decides to grant it. The investment isn’t passive. All or part of the assets can be moved into another fund, or be split among several funds. The donor can continue to add to the fund to achieve a goal, receiving a charitable deduction with each addition.

"Say you want to endow a chair at your alma mater," Wright-Violich says. "When the fund reaches the level where you can endow that chair, you make the grant."

Part of the popularity of donor-advised funds stems from current economic conditions, she says. As investors rebalance their portfolios, they may want to sell stocks that have appreciated dramatically. If they have enough cash at hand, they can use that to buy safer securities and donate the stock, enjoying the double tax break in the process.

Charity is an American tradition, particularly for the wealthy elite. More than 60 percent of Americans give to charity, according to the Bank of America Study of High Net Worth Philanthropy by The Center for Philanthropy at Indiana University. The percentage is even higher among the wealthiest segment of the population: almost 98 percent.

About one-third of charitable giving by high-net-worth donors is done with appreciated securities, Ramsay H. Slugg, senior vice president and wealth-strategies adviser for U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management, says.

There are limits. Donors may deduct no more than 30 percent of their adjusted gross income for contributions of appreciated assets in any given year, though any excess can be carried forward for up to the five ensuing years.

Typically, charitable annuities and trusts attract donors with sizable stock holdings that pay scant dividends—in a sense, asset rich and cash poor. With a charitable annuity or trust, the institution sells the stock and manages the funds, which provide a lifetime income stream.

Take, for example a Michigan State University alumnus with a large, appreciated holding in utilities. His $10,000 investment is worth $500,000 today, but his dividend is negligible. With a charitable trust, that $500,000 can generate income during his lifetime and provide a very handsome gift for Michigan State.
 
"We’re responsible to the donor to make that payout and to grow that gift," Dan Chegwidden, M.S.U.’s director of planned giving, says, noting that a 5 to 7 percent payout rate is typical with trusts.  "As the assets of the trust grow, so will his income."

By comparison, putting that $500,000 of stock in a gift annuity at a 6 percent rate (the rate is age-based) will yield $30,000 a year in fixed income. While the assets may grow to $1 million, the return to the individual is fixed.

"High net worth individuals tend to say, ‘I want to make a gift, I like the idea of my assets growing.’ But it’s all predicated on making the gift," he says, noting that this group tends to favor trusts over annuities.

"There are people who say they don’t need the income, and give the securities outright. The child of the 1930s may think twice."

There are several types of charitable gift annuities. Chegwidden cites an investor who sets up an annuity with 500 shares of stock purchased 35 years ago for $5,000 that’s now worth $50,000 and provides virtually no income.

With a gift annuity, the donor, now 68, receives $3,150 annually for the rest of her life; part of the income is tax-free until age 86. She takes a charitable deduction of $19,306 (based on the monthly mid-term Fed discount rate–in this case, 5.2 percent–and a quarterly payout) and avoids approximately $6,750 in capital gains tax.

With a deferred annuity, an option chosen by many donors who are not ready for retirement, the date when payments start is deferred at least one year into the future; most donors defer until retirement. The deferral increases the payout rate for the gift annuity and increases the charitable deduction. The longer the deferral period, the greater the deduction.

A deferred gift annuity of $250,000 using a stock with a cost basis of $100,000 made at age 55 will carry a deduction of $96,197 in the year the gift is made. When the donor retires at age 62, the annual annuity payment will be $20,750, and a portion of the income will be tax-free.

"People are a little nervous about irrevocably transferring assets and not getting something in return," Chegwidden says, citing Michigan’s tough economy. Many people there own stock that is underperforming, particularly shares in automakers.

"I know people who could give $200,000 outright, who don’t need the income," says Chegwidden. "But they think they do."

Related Links
At Least Hard Times Are Good for Someone
Fund Star Named in Gift Inquiry
Shakeup at Fidelity Investments

Mar 31

Although he’s been a professional cyclist for seven years and has worn the vaunted yellow jersey as a leader of the Tour de France, Dave Zabriskie is no less vulnerable to that bane of every cyclist, from amateurs to pros: cars.  

Five years ago, while riding down a canyon road in Utah on a training run, Zabriskie was clipped by an S.U.V. He was flung from his bike and onto the hard pavement. The left side of his body was immobile. Later at the hospital, pins were inserted into his left wrist and leg; doctors doubted he’d ever ride again.

"I underwent painful rehabilitation just to walk again, let alone ride a bike," says the 29-year-old.

By the following year, Zabriskie was leader of the pack once again. During a stage of the Tour of Spain, he made a risky breakaway and pulled ahead by almost 100 miles. "I had no idea whether or not I could pull it off," Zabriskie recalls. "Toward the end of the stage, I was vomiting [because] I was digging so deep."

Zabriskie has since become one of the premier time-trial cyclists in the world, specializing in those race stages during which cyclists compete individually against the clock. In the first stage of the 2005 Tour de France, he set a record for the fastest time trial ever in that race, with an average speed of more than 34 miles per hour over the 12-mile length of the course, narrowly edging Lance Armstrong. Zabriskie has also won a stage at the Tour of Italy, making him the only American to have ever won individual stages at each of the three grand tours of Europe. Not even the legendary Armstrong pulled off that particular feat.

In a strange twist of fate, his accident made him a better cyclist—he became more focused on avoiding injury than ever before. "When I starting racing and was moving through the ranks, I found myself breaking away and time-trialing to the finish line to avoid crashes," he says.

Zabriskie began riding seriously in high school when a teacher who noticed his interest in biking suggested he join a local cycling club in Salt Lake City. The club introduced him to longer rides and competitions, and Zabriskie eventually won a race that qualified him to live and train at the U.S. Olympic Training Center in Colorado Springs. He then qualified to become a member of the national team and began his international racing career. He now races between 70 to 90 days a year, and trains almost every day, sometimes up to seven hours a day.

The cyclist recently switched team affiliations from the powerful Team CSC squad to the newer and lesser-known Slipstream-Chipotle, in part because of its rigorous emphasis on drug testing (each of the team’s riders has agreed to be tested 1,200 times throughout the season, 20 times more often than required of other professional cyclists).

As for compensation, Zabriskie says that although professional cyclists can earn a pretty good living, the pay pales in comparison to what pros in other sports make.

"Most cyclists don’t make as much in salary as a golfer makes in prize money for one event," Zabriskie says. "Why couldn’t I be a golfer?"
Related Links
Landis Down to One Appeal to Keep Tour de France Title
Nascar’s Race Problem
The Economics of Tour De France Breakaways

Mar 31

No one wants a big payday to morph into a beastly tax burden. So while the best tax strategies are usually those crafted long before you actually collect any income, there are some last-minute moves that can help shelter at least a few of those zeros—even for those with poor planning skills.

1. We’re In the Money

Options that are suddenly worth more than their strike price can create a sizeable tax bill when they’re exercised and sold. Executives often will work with financial advisers to craft a series of puts and calls—selling points for the stock so it’s not liquidated all at once, generating a monstrous tax bite.

However, Steve Parrish of Principal Financial Group notes that spreading the sale of corporate stock can bring other concerns. "You run the risk of something like Enron’s stock," he says. "It could plummet."

So while selling that heap of options all at once creates little opportunity for protecting the gain from tax, Parrish is sanguine on the situation.

"With capital-gains tax at just 15 percent, there’s an argument that it will never be this low again," he says. "In the 1990s there was almost no difference between ordinary income tax and capital-gains tax rates. Now there is more than a 50 percent difference. This is the lowest I’ve ever seen."

2. Web 2.0 Venture Pays Off

Ever wonder why angel investors are usually former entrepreneurs who struck gold on an I.P.O.? Thank Section 1045 of the Internal Revenue Code.

That provision allows them to sell stock in their original venture and plow all of that capital into a new launch—without paying tax on the gain. The only restrictions: The new investment must occur within 60 days of the stock sale and it cannot exceed $10 million.

This one’s a favorite of venture capitalists, says Alan Olsen, of Greenstein, Rogoff, Olsen & Co., a leading Silicon Valley C.P.A. firm. "And if you keep starting new companies, that capital can stay protected," he says.

The rest of the money? That’s subject to capital-gains tax of 15 percent.

3. The Wall Street Bonus

Signs don’t look promising for big bonuses on Wall Street this year, but it’s not uncommon for traders to walk away with cash that is several times as big as a base salary—almost guaranteeing a fairly substantial check to the I.R.S.

But Tad Borek, a lawyer and investment adviser in San Francisco, suggests that traders uncork some losses to offset that gain. And losses are sadly likely to be in abundance this year.

"If you already have ordinary income from regular bonds, for example, or a money market fund that’s generating interest, get rid of those and put the capital into municipal bonds or a tax-exempt money market," Borek says. "These may pay less but you need to bring down your income—and cut the tax bite for this year."
  Borek also suggests selling investment property if you have a high income, and have a loss from the property that is being carried forward, rather than being used. "If you sell the property, and terminate that activity, you can unlock that loss," he says.

Fire sale in the Hamptons, anyone?

4. Going Public

For a founder working toward an I.P.O., exercising some strategy before shares blossom into millions can make a big difference in tax payments.

"Two years out is the opportune time to plan before going public," says Greg Horning, director of SC&H Financial Advisors Inc., in Sparks, Maryland. Shares sold on the day the company goes public—commonly done—generate hefty (but avoidable) capital gains, he says.

Horning’s solution? Trusts.

Taking a small percentage of the company’s prepublic shares, and placing them in a tax shelter can protect that capital from an immediate tax bite.

How does this work? Say an early startup is valued at $1 million. A founder gives 1 percent of the company to each of his children in the form of a trust. While these shares are technically worth $10,000, they’re likely valued less than that because as nonpublicly traded stock, they’re harder to sell.

That means the founder could transfer even more shares as long as the value stays south of $12,000 and not spark gift taxes.

Two years later, the startup goes public and is suddenly worth $100 million. That 1 percent is now worth $1 million. And when the trust sells the shares, it pays capital-gains tax too—but only on the profit.

For a founder who’s too late to the trust-planning stage, and sells off shares, Horning suggests at least prepaying state income taxes so these can be deducted on the federal tax return. "It’s not a big dent on the taxes, but it’s something," he says.

5. Walking With Vested Stock

That C.E.O. leaving with millions in vested stock needs a good financial expert on hand. The first thing to assess, says Ernst & Young’s Elda Di Re, is which stocks have the highest cost basis—and the least profit—and which have the lowest.

"Sell the ones with the highest, which will generate a lower tax," she says. "And think about putting those with the most profit in a charitable remainder trust, or give them away outright."

A big advantage to this kind of trust is that it generates an immediate tax deduction from the value of the stocks used to fund it, plus it creates an annual annuity for the C.E.O., who then pays capital-gains tax only when he draws this income—and not on the full amount.

Ultimately, each scenario brings its own unique tax footprint. So, in the end, what is the best strategy for high earners?

"They need to pick the best preparer they can afford," says Alvin S. Bailey, a tax attorney specializing in I.R.S. issues, who spent 27 years working with the agency’s chief counsel. "This can prevent problems in the long run."

Enough said.

Related Links
A 1.0 Awards Show for a 2.0 World
My Dinner With Warren
Steer Clear of Red Flags

« Previous Entries Next Entries »